  | 
  
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		hirohawa Community Member
  
  Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 1067
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri May 07, 2010 11:37 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Cylinder covers are metal on the hero, period.
 
 
Besides the fact that they are, the propmaster was smart and professional enough to know that Resin would shatter off the cylinder the first time it would have fired from the spent gasses of the loads. | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		jameth Community Member
 
  Joined: 02 Feb 2010 Posts: 825
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 12:13 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Nexus6 wrote: | 	 		   	  | Staar wrote: | 	 		  In all honesty the comparison is no longer comparing apples with apples because the last Sid was built a before his death and Rich has new information to work with - so there have to be differences..
 
 
That said, I think it would be wise not to re-open this debate.. There are plenty of threads here discussing the merits of both (albeit slightly older) models and there ARE merits and shortcomings to both - even in Rich's current build…
 
 
Search the archives and draw your own conclusion.
 
 
Regards
 
MARK | 	  
 
DEFINITE words of wisdom ^there^.
 
 
Good form, sir. | 	  
 
 
Well I already got PMs about this.  I don't care about forum drama and have no interest in digging around old posts to find out about it.
 
 
I was just asking a simple question because we were talkinga about metal and the sidkit is the other metal blaster.
 
 
I'm out.
 
 
You all take care | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		andy Community Guide
  
  Joined: 01 Nov 2006 Posts: 6237 Location: Rochester, NY
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 12:13 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | propsjonnyb wrote: | 	 		  | Andy , I am sorry  for  contradicting you slightly, and  I'm not asking you  to  take my word on  it ,    but a properly  cast  resin  ABS piece  can be stronger than  steel, and be made to  look and feel  like  steel  even down to  being  magnetic !. | 	  
 
 
They have that stuff now, but I never heard of it being used in 1981 ever, that is why they cast the stunts in rubber. I am not sure that quality of resin existed then. I am also not going to compare injection molded plastics to stuff cast from silicone. 
 
 
No one is contesting the Steyr clip and housing are plastic. I have had a whole assembly in my hands, and the finish matches what we saw on the hero perfectly. So they were made from the original plastic parts without a doubt. 
 
 
Most importantly, several people who held the gun in their hands all told me they thought the material for the cylinder covers was metal from how it felt. Mark's detail photo makes me even more certain of it. 
 
 
Andy | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		Staar Community Member
  
  Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 757 Location: AUSTRALIA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 1:06 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | jameth wrote: | 	 		  
 
Well I already got PMs about this.  I don't care about forum drama and have no interest in digging around old posts to find out about it.
 
 
I was just asking a simple question because we were talkinga about metal and the sidkit is the other metal blaster.
 
 
I'm out.
 
 
You all take care | 	  
 
 
Relax jameth mate.. 
 
 
The referral to other threads has nothing to do with trying to stir up the controversy all over again (which we are all keen to avoid), but rather because I feel those threads contain a WEALTH of information regarding the builds, the type of metal used, the cleanness of the casts used by both Sid and Rich - and more.
 
 
If you DO dig around you wil find the most fascinating information contained there ..
 
 
Regards
 
 
MARK _________________  
 
  | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		clutch Community Member
  
  Joined: 12 Dec 2006 Posts: 548
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 10:09 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				
 
 
Can you imagine buying that and then cutting it apart?!! | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		racprops Community Member
  
  Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2450 Location: Phoenix AZ
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 11:24 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				It is scary, you have to pay $700.00 to $1500.00 for a Steyr Receiver and it is very hard steel so you try to hold it in a mill vice but without damaging the finish…then you try to mill out all that metal.
 
 
Heard from a couple of people that have done it, it is no fun.
 
 
I know I took a few plastic castings to get my early model right. (I was shooting blind and figuring it out with no help…) I had molded a Steyr Receiver stock and then started machining plastic castings instead. 
 
 
I have sold a couple of models as guilds to “how to” make the cuts…
 
 
The current model has a completely redone new master made of the receiver, so I did it again.
 
 
Again I believe I covered a lot of this in my articles.
 
 
Rich _________________ I never have enough time to do all I want to do! | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		propsjonnyb Community Member
 
  Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 476 Location: Helmdon, Northamptonshire  UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 11:51 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				For those  that are  interested  I have  shot and handled a number of  Styers over the  years and  have been fortunate  to  visit  the  Styer factory and  Shooting School and Range and  actually  fired a  Remington  .222 SL  and  .357 MG  and  hold three 'Marksman'  awards from Styer for  200 yds , 500yds , and 1000 yards   and  I can  personally  confirm the  details  regarding  the  Styer part  of  the  hero,  Richard is  completely  correct in  all that  he has said  regarding  the  upper  reciever , I have examined  the  magazine and  can  confirm  it  does indeed have a unique  rotating  cylinder mechanisim operated by the  bolt  action  , the  ammobox( magazine ) holds  the  bullet cartridges and is  simply replaced when  empty,   so  you  carry spare 'clips'  as full  boxes.  And  Styer did  at  one  time  produce a transparent  plastic magazine ( ammo box ) so you  could see  how many  were loaded at any time . 
 
 
This  is  the  piece taken  from the  Styer ( photo courtesy  of  Phil S.)
 
 
 
 
 
And  a Styer Mannlincher  .222 Remingon SL 
 
 
 
 
 
and  just to  be  provocative!   here's a shot  of a different  Styer Mannlincher  model  
 
 
  | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		racprops Community Member
  
  Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2450 Location: Phoenix AZ
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat May 08, 2010 12:14 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				The Clip I got had a transparent back cover, so you could see the rounds..
 
 
The two holes I dtill in the lower back are where the pin went to hold the clip retainer. 
 
 
As we have seen in the photos of the prop they let the clip sit a little lower and not fully in the housing, the retainer would not have worked with the clip.
 
 
RIch _________________ I never have enough time to do all I want to do! | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		joberg Community Member
 .jpg) 
  Joined: 06 Oct 2008 Posts: 9463
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 7:56 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Just my two cents here   : to think that ABS plastic was non-existant in 1981 is a bit much...since they were available in the industry in the '50s.
 
That said, we do know that the cost of that gun kept mounting during its build; to farm out just 2 ABS side covers to another manufacturing company (a studio doesn't have an in-house capability of producing industry grade steel/alu mold) would have been prohibitive...they went for the easy way: steel/alu side covers. | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		propsjonnyb Community Member
 
  Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 476 Location: Helmdon, Northamptonshire  UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 4:16 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| But  almost  all   film  and  TV props departments  do  have  molding and casting  facilities ,  I very much doubt they were steel shrouds , that  woud be  excessive and  expensive ,  but  low melt  cast  alloy  is possible, as some of the  more  professional shops  have experierenced hot  metal  technicians , cast or  machined aluminium is  more  likely ,  but  as the  majority of  prop shops  deal in resin and rubber casts it  is  probably more  likely   they were resin  , and  digressing  slightly off  film topic  the  Total Recall shrouds  for  the  Uzi's  used in that  film   were  resin cast,  in fact  the  majority  of  static  non- functioning props  weapons in general - most  of the  time -  are either  rubber (stunt)  or  resin  casts,  for most  films  where ' firing'   guns are  required  they are normally  hired from  agencies  unless  it's  a  real requirement   (eg Alien - M41a Pulse  Rifle ) to have a complete  working  gun   and  in these  cases the  gun  would  have been  either  fabricated  by  an outside  gunsmith's or an armourer  familiar with  film  Directors  requests-  and all that that  entails !      I have  been using  PFC guns  for  well over 20 years  and  have fabricated many shrouds and  add-on bits  and  pieces  to  replicate sci-fi weapons  and  guns seen  on film  and  95% of them  were cast resin as there  is  a lot  of  work in fabricating  metal,  as any  who  really have  tried  will know , and  resin is a much easier medium to  work with and  I've  been working  with low melt alloys  and  hot  metal for  years as well.     It doesn't really  matter  if the  shrouds were resin or  for  that matter  all metal at the end  of  the  day ,  as all they  were doing  is  hiding  the 'real' gun inside and since  they totally  trashed the  Styer,  to get it  to  fit as Rich has explained previously,   the  only  real  working  parts  were the  bulldog  with  a longer  barrel . | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		BeastMaster Community Member
  
  Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 995 Location: UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 5:20 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I always thought the bolt lever side cover was resin since I saw the additional japanese photos. a camera flash would turn aluminium white though most of those scrapings are in shadow and are clearly defined (not flashed out) and don't appear shiney reflective metalic as scraped metal would but a dull yellow-tinge resin colour. These scrapings were done to accomodate a better fit for the bullet chamber, so it's possible they were done on the fly whilst the cover was still attatched. I would think alluminium would be too hard to scrape out like that. _________________ "F*ck it, it's just a movie. Let him worry about it" Harrison Ford | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		hirohawa Community Member
  
  Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 1067
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 5:43 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				A revolver expels gas from it's cylinder that will shatter resin.  A notable example was on the RPF where someone tried to fit  a BSG clamshell over a real revolver and splintered the resin on the first shot.
 
 
The cylinder covers where metal.  Remember there are more options than just steel or aluminum.  That's all I'm going to say on the matter. | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		ironfist Community Member
  
  Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 310 Location: East Hartford,CT
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 8:20 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Isn't. There a vent in the one side of the covers? Also what proof do we have that this gun ever fired a real bullet or even a blank? Wouldn't a real working gun on. Set also require. Experts ln fire arm safty to be onhand at all times? _________________ The other Karl! | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		racprops Community Member
  
  Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2450 Location: Phoenix AZ
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 8:34 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Watch him chase Zora, frame by frame it is clear it fired on set.
 
 
Also we were told by the propmaster they has special pryo blanks made.
 
 
Rich _________________ I never have enough time to do all I want to do! | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		racprops Community Member
  
  Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 2450 Location: Phoenix AZ
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun May 09, 2010 8:36 pm    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Also fire safety was more lax back in the early 80s.
 
 
They tighten up after Twilight Zone and John Eric-Hexum killed himself with a blank.
 
 
Rich _________________ I never have enough time to do all I want to do! | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		ironfist Community Member
  
  Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 310 Location: East Hartford,CT
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:10 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Sorry thats kind of what Im getting at. Shooting a real bullet, causes back pressure, Shooting a blank with nothing more than some wadding holding in the charge would cause almost none as all the force would be directed out the front of the gun (the path of least resistance). Also this isnt a sealed unit. Front and back of the side plate on the left hand side of the gun are very open to vent anytype of gas, and as for the otherside, there is the large opening thet the Styre arm sits over. So I think that arguement that this couldnt have been plastic/resin because of gas build up doesnt really work here. As with the clamshell on a BSG gun. Whole different type of animal. _________________ The other Karl! | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		hirohawa Community Member
  
  Joined: 18 May 2006 Posts: 1067
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 4:27 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Not really sure why this is being argued.  As many people who first hand knowledge of the hero have reported that it did indeed have metal side covers.  And blanks do have alot of percussive force, especially when they make big muzzle flares as they do in the movie.  Maybe resin would survive - improbable -  but maybe.
 
 
We will never know as the Hero had metal cylinder covers.
 
 
Maybe we can build a time machine and put resin covers on it the day of the shoot and see if they would survive. | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		propsjonnyb Community Member
 
  Joined: 16 Jul 2009 Posts: 476 Location: Helmdon, Northamptonshire  UK
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 5:05 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| I agree with  Ironfist and Beastmaster, as  I have  my  own  pyro caps made  up to my  own  design  for  my  PFC guns,  the  donor  in my conversion has  a special  forward venting system,  which  I use to  make the  blaster look more like its counterpart on  film , it  is  a theatrical pyro what most would call a 'special effect' ,  but its designed to produce, 'flame and  smoke' - just  as  the  hero did , there is very little pressure  produced and there are  vents in the  shrouds , so  they don't blow off  or shatter ! and  I suspect  the  pyro blanks used in the  hero  were made in a similar fashion  to produce  lots of   smoke and flame , they  were not standard .44 blanks as most of  the documentary evidence in  books, documentaries ,  talk shows, and articles  etc - all  refer to pyro charges  being used in the  hero . Metal or  resin , it  doesn't really matter apart from  an 'all metal'  gun   such as  the  Sidkit or Coyle weighs  in quite  heavily,  especially  when loaded with its 'dummy' bullets , our 'professional' experts  are the  police force members of this forum who carry real guns around with  then all day - ask them  what its like to carry a heavy weapon on the  hip and would they like a lighter  gun   in relation to  the  weight  of  a Sidkit  or  Coyle and see what they say - I suspect  most  would  like a lighter  gun  real or  otherwise  -I completely  agree - you  want it to  feel  'real' -  I want it to  look feel and sound real' whilst  be  safe and legal to  own and use in the  privacy of my own  home.   The two guns  that makeup the  hero  were stripped amd machined right  down  to the ' bear  bones' , on the  hero only  the CA was functional ,  the  Styer was cut down so much,  it was really only used as 'dressing' the  bolt action  being replaced with  a fabricated  reduced action one , even the Styer double  triggers were  replaced ,  one trigger being  fixed in position and the  other  used on the  CA  so  everything points to the hero blaster  being reasonably heavy,  as two  become  one ,  but  not to the  degree that  Harrison Ford as the  actor couldn't carry it about  in  the  scenes where it is extensively  used .   To  add  a final point  , the  interior  of the  lhs & rhs shroulds have to  have enough  clearance to allow the  free rotation of the  cylinder drum, when  the  trigger  is pulled  most static models don't  bother , Coyles always have had free rotation , but  no  link to the trigger action ,  the  early Sidkits were tight and then  they mimicked  the  Coyles  up to the  point Siderio  passed away, my  final  point  bein, g it's much easier to fabricate a resin shroud,  than a metal one  and  make all the  necessary  adjustments reqired  for  test fitting ,  as  you progress your  build. | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		Staar Community Member
  
  Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 757 Location: AUSTRALIA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 5:31 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | hirohawa wrote: | 	 		  | Not really sure why this is being argued.  As many people who first hand knowledge of the hero have reported that it did indeed have metal side covers. | 	  
 
 
Hirohawa mate, I couldn't agree more..
 
 
Done and dusted I'd say.
 
 
Regards
 
 
MARK _________________  
 
  | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
        
        
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		joberg Community Member
 .jpg) 
  Joined: 06 Oct 2008 Posts: 9463
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 6:30 am    Post subject:  | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Wish Doc could shime in...he fired his replica; don't think his shrouds were resin.  Also, are we sure the barrel rotated in the hero gun?
 
Just a thought really, I mean no need to go crazy and try to modify the shrouds when your barrel is static...right?  We never see Harrison fire 2 shots in a row.  All you need is a working trigger and hammer to fire your bullet in one chamber only.  Don't know if that make sense, but sometimes it's better to use a gun that way. | 
			 
		 
	 |  
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	   | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
	
  
     | 
     | 
     | 
   
  
      | 
        
	
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
  | 
   
 
 | 
      | 
   
  
     | 
      | 
     | 
    
 | 
  |